Category: personal

Stuff about me (Bernard HP Gilroy), instead of or in addition to stuff about education.

  • I might just be succumbing to the lure of reliving my misspent youth…

    … but this looks awesome.

    Apparently, the release date is 2010 December 17.

    Just for completeness, the original Comicon 2009 trailer is embedded below the fold.

    (more…)

  • What Michael Steel Won’t Let Me Post

    OK, that’s melodramatic.  All that’s occurred so far is that their mediocre site has choked several times since I’ve tried to post a comment in response to a blog post there.  The post blames President Obama for the jobs lost in the past 11 months and worries what it would mean if he does a “hard pivot” towards jobs creation in January.

    Now, it might just be that the GOP site is poorly designed (other evidence suggests this) or that they’re just slow.  And it might be that they don’t like hearing feedback from people who haven’t drunk their Kool-Aid.  In any event, after my third attempt to post, I decided to cut-and-paste my comment and post it here.  Ah, the joys of the vanity electronic press!

    I totally agree.  After all, it’s simply irrelevant that the economy inherited by the President was bleeding jobs at a rate unseen in 70 years, after his predecessor managed to follow a decade of strong growth with a decade of retrenchment, turning surpluses into deficits while squeezing the middle class and giving away trillions to the uber-rich.  And it doesn’t really matter that many private forecasters believe that the economy would be in far more dire straits absent the stimulus (http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2009/11/charts_and_graphs_that_will_fi_2.html), including shedding perhaps an additional 2% of jobs if the money -hadn’t- beeen spent.

    What really counts is ideological purity, not pesky things like facts or reality.  After all, if you stay pegged to reality, you might -never- get the chance to turn a national tragedy into carte blanche to launch your own war of choice against a nation completely unaffiliated with the attackers, while ignoring the fact that 15 out of 19 of them came from the Middle Eastern country that you and your daddy were so close to.  And what would even -be- the point of being in power if you can’t shred two hundred years of judicial philosophy to pursue your own mean ends?

  • Week 51 in the Program

    Well, I’m closing in on one year in the HMR program and, looking back, I feel pretty satisfied.  I hit my nominal target (weight loss of 150 lbs) a couple of weeks back and have managed to keep going a bit, so it wasn’t a fluke.  My blood pressure today was 110 over 80, which is much better than when I started (when it was something like 180 over 130).

    The next step is the transition into maintenance but I’m holding off on that until after the holidays.  It’s going to be hard enough without adding in all the irregularity of the next six weeks.

    Since August I’ve been tracking my weight twice a day, when I get up and just before I got to sleep.  The first thing that struck me is how irregular this is.  Although the morning weight has been mostly consistent, the nightly weight has bounced around.  The second thing is, it’s been a good review of linear regression.  I can use the daily tracking to predict the weight I get at HMR, to a pretty good extent.  This means I can keep track and, after a day when I might tick upward, be sure to even out.

    Weight 2009_1124

    projection 2009_1124

  • Security v. Security Theater

    Not surprisingly, Bruce Schneier has an excellent piece talking about the psychological dimensions of terrorism and what a strong, stable industrial democracy can do in the face of amorphous threats… without sacrificing its principles, its freedoms, or its citizens.

    If you live in an advanced country, you should probably read this — before the next attack and the urge for primal reactions.

  • Week 48 in the Program

    Well, it’s been a long time since I’ve written an update, for absolutely no good reason. Things continue to go really well and I’m very happy with my progress. I weigh at 225.6 lbs. now, which is not only 147.4 lbs below my start weight — it’s lower than I’ve been since, most likely, high school! My blood pressure today was 108 over 70, which is fantastic and really in the end justifies the work.
    Because we’re closing in on when I should switch to the maintenance part of the program, they remeasured my body stats.

    2008 Nov 20 2009 Nov 3
    Weight 373.0 225.6
    Chest 57 44
    Waist 61 45
    Hips 59 45
    Biceps 13 11
    Thigh 24 19.5

    And some pretty graphs to go along with it:
    Overall weightDaily Projection

  • Week 32 in the Program

    Weight this week | Change since last week | Total change
    260.8 | -4.0 | -112.2

    I’m maintaining my 2 lb/wk rate, more or less, though it’s been a little erratic — for example, almost no loss last week, four pounds this one. That’s odd. The next month will be a challenge because I’ll be doing a lot of traveling and I won’t actually get to class more than once or twice. I’m relatively confident I can keep on the straight-and-narrow but we’ll see.
    Weight 2009_0723

  • Annie-versary

    This is the one-year mark for Annie and me — one year ago we started going out officially.  It’s been an adventure, one I wouldn’t have missed for the world.  I have never felt the kind of love I feel for her, and I have never received the love she gives to me.  I don’t have much as a standard of comparision but I think our first year has been pretty awesome, one of the best in the history of first years.  I’m hoping for many many more.

    Annie and I at Valentine's Day Dinner

  • Online Obscenity

    In this online review, Joe Brown of Wired waxes eloquent about the Bugatti Veyron 16.4 Grand Sport, a new ultra-high-end sports convertible.  The Grand Sport costs a cool 2.1 M$ and boosts appropriately over-the-top stats like a top speed of 217 mph and 1001 horsepower from a 16-cylinder engine.  It will come as no suprise to anyone who knows me, but I find this car — all cars, really — singularly unmoving.  I’ve never been an American in love with the road.

    Joe Brown is, or at least, he’s in lust with it.  His prose is rapturous while describing this overpriced, inefficient, and essentially unneeded major appliance:  He revels in the “isolationist joy, an out-of-body awareness that you’re moving faster than the world can react” and delights in watching “entire generations of insects die on your prow”.  A major draw seems to be that the car can outrun “not only the 5-0’s cruisers, but their helicopters, too”.  And it’d better, because driving that fast is liable to make your car an overpriced kinetic-kill weapon — the world’s largest and silliest bullet.

    But that’s OK, because no real person driving real roads would ever be able to get the car up to that speed, much less maintain it for anything but an infinitesimal time.  I’m always astounded by how crucial top speed seems to be to the ego of a car enthusiast, who must drool (at a distance) at the flights of fancy embodied in the speedometer.  Though the car will never, in any practical usage, reach this speed, the auto junkie needs to know that, by God, it could, if only no one else ever drove on the roads.  Of course, a car like this is by design the opposite of practical.  The admittedly impressive engineering involved (getting a convertible that can function at 200 mph is, I concede, quite a feat) is intended only to impress, not to achieve the elegant solution of a practical problem.  In that sense, it’s the exact opposite of engineering.  Indeed, this comes off as almost a streamlined Rube Goldberg machine:  What is the silliest way to move an individual between point A and point B?  The Grand Sport.  It’s not art in engineering; it’s just peacock feathers.

    Towards the end of the review, Mr. Brown admits “It is not perfect — no car will ever be.”  He laments that “We’re at the end of the petroleum era, the end of a golden age of supercars where speed can be sought regardless of consequence.”  Let’s certainly hope so.  Let’s hope we soon wake up from this delusional teenage fantasy of consequence-free open road indulgence.

  • Week 29 in the Program

    Weight this week | Change since last week | Total change
    267.0 | -1.4 | -106.0

    Not much of note here. I’ve really given up predicting the details of my weight change. I don’t know why it dropped off some, but that can apparently happen. Anyway, I’m still pretty happy with where I am.

    weight-2009_06702

  • Week 26 in the Program

    weight-2009_0609bp-2009_0609I’ve been bouncing around some.  But I finally broke the 100-pound mark.

    Weight this week | Change since last week | Total change
    271.0 | -6.6 | -102.0

    NB: I’ve recalibrated a bit here to use the original weight as measured by PWMC (373 lbs), since that’s where I’m getting my weekly numbers.

    Six months in and a hundred pounds down — this is actually almost exactly where I’d hoped to be.  What I’ve learned is that I’m not really ready to live “outside the box” yet, as my only weight gains have come in weeks I could not stay on-program.  Next week will be a test of this, as I will be at a conference in Philly all week.  But Annie’s coming so she’ll probably be my conscience (as in many things 🙂 ) and keep me plugging away.

    It’s also time for me to look forward and decide what my eventual goal weight will be.  I have to put some thought into that.