
From the cartoonist Lee Judge ( http://media.kansascity.com/images/cartoons/judge/04-2010/judge_04272010_700.jpg)

From the cartoonist Lee Judge ( http://media.kansascity.com/images/cartoons/judge/04-2010/judge_04272010_700.jpg)
A meme spreading like wildfire throughout the rabid right is that “47% of Americans don’t even pay federal income tax.” Clearly it’s time for another tax cut for the uber-wealthy in the interest of “fairness”.
David Leonhardt wrote a piece in today’s New York Times exploring this. Short version: The number is true… and meaningless. The working class pays far more in total taxes (once payroll, state, and sales tax is included). People aren’t getting a free ride. The article is worth a read, if only as an example of a calm, fact-based response to overheated breathless propaganda.
Where did the rabid right get the figure of 16,500 new “IRS agents” that (they claim) will be required to enforce the individual mandate in the Affordable Care Act?
They made it up.
Really. It came from nowhere. In fact, the IRS will add few or no agents, and perhaps hardly any staff at all. There’s a really nice dissection of this ludicrous claim over at factcheck.org. Basically, the number was invented based on a bad estimate, inflated through dubious assumptions, and then just hand-waved into fact.
Just remember, the next time someone quotes to you some scary scary provision of the ACA: There’s a non-negligible chance that they are lying or repeating a lie.
Does this story serve to expose the hypocrisy of the Republican Party’s self-proclaimed credentials as the “party of family values” (in that the RNC paid for an evening at “a bondage-themed nightclub featuring topless women dancers imitating lesbian sex”)? Or does it serve to expose the hypocrisy of the equally fictional Republican claim to being the “party of fiscal responsibility” (in that the RNC apparently can’t say how such an egregious expenditure slipped past their checks)?
One for the ages, I suppose. But I suspect the media will drop the story after today (to the limited extent they carried it at all), because it’s the RNC and not the DNC…
There’s a thread at Lawyers, Guns, and Money linking to another story about some people who want to see “Confederate ancestry” recognized as a legitimate group for ethnic protection, and who are using Box 19 of the Census to do it. Commenter kommrade reproductive vigor says:
I guess I’m supposed to fill in Confederate Southern American (3/5ths).
Which, when you think about, nicely punctures that argument…
From a comment on Political Animal, in a thread about a brick-thrower who wants to “end socialism and the government takeover”, and has time to do so because he’s receiving disability checks from the government. In describing the futility of explaining this contradiction to the brick-thrower, a commenter pointed out,
You can’t reason someone out of a position they didn’t reason themselves into.
And that is the actual greatest threat to the Republic today: The noisy whiners who don’t know anything factual and are proud of it. How does an Enlightenment democracy function, when one side denies the value of both logic and evidence?
I mean, what else might he have meant when he said:
We will not hand our children a poorer, weaker America than the one we inherited.
After eight years of surplus-to-deficit magic, unfunded giveaways, two wars (one of which was of choice), and a demolished financial system, followed by a year marshaling the troops to say No to every attempt to recover from the damage inflicted by those eight years, the best contribution the Republicans could make to America’s greatness would be to go away…
Posted as a comment in a Political Animal article on Mitt Romney’s increasingly desperate gyrations attempting to stay relevant:
In fact, the conservative “movement” resembles a clique in junior high school these days. They shout during assemblies, make fun of gay people, and do nothing but posture in front of each other, trying to see who can look the most “bad-ass.” And they get shitty grades because they watch too much Fox News and slack off in science lab. And they don’t know anything about history. And they’re counting on their rich parents saving them.
Meanwhile, the rest of the country just got an advanced degree from Harvard.
Posted by: chrenson on March 22, 2010 at 4:22 PM
So, against all expectation, the Democratic Party managed to hang together and finally pass the comprehensive health care bill.
As a lifelong Democrat, I am flabbergasted. I was certain they’d find a way to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory and fumble on the proverbial one-yard line. I’m glad to be disappointed, but this long, ugly process has exposed disturbing trends in this nation. It’s still possible that this will be the high-water mark of a great republic.
Though their target is incorrect, the Tea Partiers ironically have a point: the Republic does face a crisis. It’s not driven by phantasmical jackbooted insurance inspectors breaking into homes and dragging Grandma off to mythical death panels. It stems from the unholy matrimony among a slick ideological establishment; sensationalist, irresponsible, and manipulative 24 hour “news” media; and an angry, incoherent, willfully-ignorant populace. Though these people claim to revere the Founders, they in fact stand opposed to the core of Enlightenment democracy that was bequeathed to us: an informed and educated citizenry engaged in reasoned debate — with passion, to be sure, but never abandoning reason and never so cocksure as to assume that opponents must be enemies.
Considering that the Tea Partiers have labeled rule by majority vote “tyranny”, it’s hard to see how anything resembling the United States of America could survive their rage. Their unifying feature is anger and it will burn everything it can reach. And the Republican Party stands on the sideline and feeds it, a mixture of cynical arsonist and maniacal six-year-old.
How can a deliberative legislature — how can a functioning democracy — endure when one side has abandoned argument and evidence? When one side decides that anything their opponents say must be untrue? If one side locks itself in its own fantasy world and declares invalid any source that might challenge its funhouse-mirror self-reality?