Blog

  • Texas approves explicitly conservative curriculum

    The writing was on the wall for a while, but Texas just approved a revision to its history curriculum.  It has an explicit conservative bent — I mean, literally, students are to learn about “the conservative resurgence of the 1980s and 1990s, including Phyllis Schlafly, the Contract With America, the Heritage Foundation, the Moral Majority and the National Rifle Association.”

    Because it is such a large market and has a very central purchasing authority, Texas carries a lot of weight with textbook publishers, meaning that students of many states will receive textbooks crafted to meet the Texas requirements.  (California is an even larger market but is not buying new books for a long while due to its ongoing slow meltdown.)

    Am I worried?  Less than might be expected by people who know me.  Why?  Because I’m a teacher.  I have learned that the easiest way to cause students to reject any piece of knowledge is to proclaim it loudly in a textbook.  Especially with an increasingly distrustful and tech-savvy student population, attempts to ram down an official line on anything seem likely to fail.

  • Reconciliation, in 90 seconds or less.

    This video gives an explanation of the process of reconciliation vis a vis the health care bill. It’s brief, lucid, and informative. Needless to say, it won’t get airplay or attention. *sigh*

  • I might just be succumbing to the lure of reliving my misspent youth…

    … but this looks awesome.

    Apparently, the release date is 2010 December 17.

    Just for completeness, the original Comicon 2009 trailer is embedded below the fold.

    (more…)

  • Idiot Quote of the Day

    I don’t usually like to post these, but this one from Mary Matalin just floored me:

    The majority vote is tyranny of the minority.

    I agree that context is everything, so please, go ahead and read the whole bit.  (You’ll have to search through the transcript; I’ll wait.) (more…)

  • Our Broken Senate

    Update: Also, news comes that Senator Richard Shelby has placed a blanket hold on Obama administration appointments, apparently as part of a plan to extort pork for his state.  With Scott Brown having been seated, the

    Is the Senate broken?  Or is the recent fretting over the filibuster just myopic whining that misunderstands our history?  The following graphs and links indicate that, in fact, the Senate is broken — the filibuster has been deployed more often, than before.  Details below the fold.

    (more…)

  • Shouting in the wind

    I know I’m not going to convince anybody, and this is far from the most important place to make this point, but I feel like I have to weigh in:

    Record snowfall does not “disprove” global warming.

    To advance the opposite proposition seriously, you’d have to do one or more of the following:

    • Fail to understand the different between “global” and “local”.  Being cold here says nothing about the global aggregate.
    • Fail to understand that “weather” is not the same thing as “climate” and that transient variations in daily conditions do not equate to long-term large averages.
    • Be in the pocket of Big Oil and other industries with a vested interest in making sure we do nothing, ever, because it might someday mean that they reap only ridiculous profit levels rather than the truly obscene ones they get now.

    More than likely, most people braying that this is God’s message to Al Gore are committing all three mistakes at once.

  • Our (Even More) Broken Senate

    News comes that Senator Richard Shelby has placed a blanket hold on Obama administration appointments, apparently as part of a plan to extort pork for his state.  With Scott Brown having been seated, the chance of cloture on these holds seems remote.  So the Senate is even more broken.  The danger is that this will accelerate our move towards government by other means, including increased use of recess appointments.

    Oh, and what the heck is a hold?  David Waldeman explains.

    Also: a pretty funny reimagining of the note that Shelby must have given Harry Reid and the President.

  • A well-deserved smack-down on trials of terrorists

    Adam Serwer at TAPPED has a nice response to Richard Cohen’s latest hyperventilating bed-wetting over the upcoming trial of several terrorists.  I’m disappointed that NYC has successfully lobbied to have the trials held elsewhere, though I’m glad that the main reason seems to be that the extra security would be overly disruptive to city life and not that we are afraid the city would be attacked.  (As if Al Qaeda needs another reason…)

    But I simply cannot abide the weak-kneed wimps who think that “the paramount civil liberty is a sense of security”.  How absolutely bat-crazy stupid do you have to be to write something like that?  Note that it’s not even that the ultimate right is actual security — it’s only that we have a sense of security.  So apparently, in order that Richard Cohen can sleep at night without worrying about the monsters under his bed, we should sacrifice legal standards, integrity, freedom itself.  It turns out I wrote my rebuttal of his argument about two and a half years before he even wrote his article, and I stand by it:

    We are stronger than that.

    We are smarter than that.

    We are better than that.

  • Another Democrat making sense

    So why isn’t any of the so-called leadership — in the Capitol or in the Oval Office — listening?

    On the Huffington Post, Paul Begala offers his own, lucid take on the choice facing Democrats:  Pass the Senate bill, or collapse completely come November.  It’s worth the time to read.

    Now, here’s hoping the Democrats in charge get their acts together, get their courage on, and get moving.  Pass.  The.  Damn.  Bill.

  • Finally, a Democrat starts making sense.

    David Plouffe, campaign adviser to the Obama campaign and author of Audacity to Win, has written a much-needed op-ed in the Washington Post.  In it, he outlines the shape of a legislative strategy that would allow the Democrats to survive the coming midterm elections.  It’s worth a full read but the bullet-point summary is

    • Pass a meaningful health insurance reform package without delay
    • We need to show that we not just are focused on jobs but also create them.
    • Make sure voters understand what the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act did for the economy.
    • Don’t accept any lectures on spending.
    • “Change” is not just about policies.
    • Run great campaigns.
    • No bed-wetting.

    Good advice from a guy who’s shown he knows how to win.  Let’s hope someone in Washington is listening.